👀 This is an example dashboard with dummy data — Create your team →

Team Admin Dashboard

View Report
All-time data
£186k
Est. annual value ? Directional

Built from your team's logged time savings, valued at each member's hourly cost. Every logged item counts.

Firms up as more of it is backed by evidence or usage — see the confidence split below.

+£24k vs prior period
127h
Hours saved / week ? High confidence

Frequency-weighted: hours per use × how often each task runs, summed across adopted and piloting items.

Based on 34 tasks across 11 active members — enough for a stable team average.

+18.5 vs prior period
11/14
Adoption · active members ? High confidence

Members who've logged at least one AI implementation, out of paid seats. Spread across every department.

Even coverage across teams — no single function is carrying the number.

79% of tools adopted
62%
Confidence · evidence-backed ? The honesty signal

Share of your value that's backed by an evidence attachment or corroborated usage — not just self-reported.

62% backed, 38% self-reported. The higher this climbs, the harder your number is to dismiss.

+8% vs prior period
2
Needs attention · low activity ? Action

Members who haven't logged recently. Their AI wins aren't being captured.

Nudge them to keep the number complete and representative.

Nudge all →
Report readiness ?
Report readiness

How ready your team's data is to produce an AI-impact report you can take to leadership.

A number is only as strong as its data. This fills as your team:

  • logs their AI work — enough people
  • in enough detail
  • over enough time

When it's ready, your full ROI report unlocks.

78% of the way to a report you can take to leadership — right now, it hasn't been running long enough.
Next: Keep it going — a number you can defend needs about three months of activity behind it. This one just takes time.
62% of your reported value is backed by evidence or usage · 38% self-reported

Team Analytics

Member Leaderboard

Ranked by impact score — adopted implementations, hours saved, KPIs, and adoption rate.

# Member Adopted? Hrs/wk? KPIs? Score?
1
Sarah Johnson
Marketing
1814.5h492
2
Marcus Taylor
Engineering
1511.0h381
3
Aisha Patel
Operations
129.5h274
4
Raj Kumar
Sales
98.0h261
5
Laura Chen
Design
77.5h154

Tool Adoption ?

Share of the team using each tool

6 tools in use
ChatGPT11/14
Claude8/14
Cursor6/14
GitHub Copilot5/14
Notion AI4/14
Midjourney3/14

Automation Pipeline ?
Automation Pipeline

How much human involvement each logged AI task still needs — its automation potential.

  • High — strong candidate to run with little human oversight
  • Medium — partly automatable, still needs review
  • Low — mostly manual, a human stays in the loop

Spot where your team could automate further.

56 high-automation candidates across your team

High56 (38%)
Medium65 (44%)
Low27 (18%)

Based on 148 of 148 adopted implementations with automation data.

Organisation AI Stack

Tool Cost/seat/mo Seats owned Adoption
ChatGPT Plus £20/seat/mo 14 11/14 (79%)
Claude Pro £20/seat/mo 10 8/10 (80%)
Cursor £16/seat/mo 8 6/8 (75%)
GitHub Copilot £8/seat/mo 8 5/8 (63%)
Notion AI £8/seat/mo 14 4/14 (29%)

AI Tool ROI by Member

Based on hours saved × hourly rate · members who've attributed at least one item

Member Tool Hours/wk Est. value/yr Adoption
Sarah Johnson
Marketing
ChatGPT 8.5h £22,100? High confidence

From Sarah's logged tasks, backed by before/after evidence she attached. ChatGPT (browser) has no usage API, so evidence is what corroborates it here.

Evidence-backed — stands on its own.

Active
Marcus Taylor
Engineering
Cursor 11.0h £28,600? Directional

Self-reported from Marcus's logged tasks. Not yet backed by evidence or corroborated usage.

Ask Marcus to attach evidence, or connect Cursor usage, to firm this up.

Active
Aisha Patel
Operations
Claude 9.5h £19,760? High confidence

From Aisha's logged tasks, corroborated against her actual Claude API usage over the same period.

Independently confirmed — this is the strongest kind.

Active
Raj Kumar
Sales
ChatGPT 8.0h £16,640 Active
Laura Chen
Design
Midjourney 7.5h £14,820 Active

Team Members

SJ
Sarah Johnson
sarah@acmecorp.com · Marketing · Manager
Active
MT
Marcus Taylor
marcus@acmecorp.com · Engineering · Senior Dev
Active
AP
Aisha Patel
aisha@acmecorp.com · Operations · Lead
Active
RK
Raj Kumar
raj@acmecorp.com · Sales · Executive
Active
LC
Laura Chen
laura@acmecorp.com · Design · Lead
Active
JW
James Walsh
james@acmecorp.com · Finance · Analyst
Active
NB
Nina Blackwood
nina@acmecorp.com · Marketing · Strategist
Invite pending
+7
7 more members in the live dashboard

AI Consumption

Synced daily · Last sync: today 02:00 UTC
4.2M
Input tokens
1.8M
Output tokens
2,840
Requests
Member In tokens Out tokens Requests Models
Marcus Taylor
marcus@acmecorp.com
892K 381K 621 gpt-4o claude-3
Sarah Johnson
sarah@acmecorp.com
641K 274K 487 gpt-4o
Aisha Patel
aisha@acmecorp.com
418K 179K 312 claude-3
Raj Kumar
raj@acmecorp.com
287K 122K 218 gpt-4o
Unattributed
No email match · Review
184K 78K 143 gpt-4o-mini

Ready to see your team's AI impact?

Set up in under 2 minutes. No IT required.

Get started →